View Single Post
Old 18-05-2010, 20:05   #61
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Human Rights Act to be retained

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry View Post
He wasn't charged with anything and wasn't convicted of anything. These were, and indeed are, allegations which even his defence have not been privy to.

As Pierce says "If people have committed a crime, put them on trial."

It's starting to look like MI5/6 chinese whispers are what pass for due process and justice these days.

Time to start really worrying I think.
The worrying thing I mentioned earlier is that his deportation cancellation wasn't based on him not standing trial.

Do I think he should have been deported? Only if he'd been tried properly and found guilty.
So for me, the result was the right one, but how it was reached was not the right path.
We should not be trying to deport anyone who is not guilty of a crime, and we should be deporting anyone who is guilty of a serious crime no matter how they may be treated in their own country.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote