|
Re: Human Rights Act to be retained
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
Thanks for that Matt D ,interesting read and does show the truth of the matter .
I have never doubted that the press exagerate these things but it has to be said that if these stories are only reported in the press ,with government spokesmen NOT taking the oportunity to respond with the actual facts then they can't be surprised when the great unwashed only believe what's in the currant bun ,or the daily fail .If the government did use right of reply a bit more often and backed it up with hard proof then maybe we would see a bit more accurate reporting from the press.
---------- Post added at 20:52 ---------- Previous post was at 20:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing
Er, yes. If you read the ECHR you'll easily spot the bits that say 'unless such-and-such happens'. The Convention therefore explicitly allows deprivation of liberty *after due process in a court of law*.
|
i know that it's maggie that doesn't
|
Eh?
All I've done is defend the fact that we have a human rights act that is applied equally to all...and pointed out you cannot just have human rights just for the righteous among us. That it's not a pick and choose way to apply it.
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|