Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
The first thirteen years of Tory rule, the average percentage against GDP was thirty-six point three, the thirteen years of Labour it was thirty-five point three.
|
Yes, let's compare an administration that inherited double-digit inflation, a nice fat recession (2.36% drop in GDP in Q3 1979), and militant trade unions with one that inherited a stable, surplus running economy shall we?
Makes it impossible to compare the tax take, which is the stat you are looking at. The actual tax rates, no idea of, however it would probably be somewhat fairer to take the Tory numbers a bit later on once they'd had a while to work on the economy.
This is interesting reading.
Oh here's a thought for you Flyboy, despite the crap the Tories inherited they still managed better average GDP growth than Labour.
Thought number 2 - Brown removed the tax credit on share dividends, increasing the size of or causing pension deficits within companies, and causing people to invest in property instead of standard pension funds - cost to pension funds of this by the way is guesstimated at upwards of 100bln. People investing in property caused a housing bubble, more demand for similar supply. As part of satiating this demand and due to the ever increasing house prices lenders such as Northern Rock began to offer riskier and riskier mortgages on the assumption that the non-stop and rapid rises in house prices would continue.
You see where I'm going with this. That smash and grab on pension funds caused incalculable damage to our economy. From people not being able to afford homes due to the housing bubble through to mortgage backed debt bringing down lenders through to people using their homes as cashpoints, fuelling their consumption with debt while bankers fuel the economy from their end gambling away the liquidity the housing market generated.
This was the basis of a good part of Labour's economic growth, public sector employment was responsible for a good part of jobs growth.
One thing you really, surely, honestly aren't going to do is try and say that Labour's policies were good for the economy?