Thread: Parliamentary Reform Protests Continue
View Single Post
Old 14-05-2010, 15:54   #8
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Parliamentary Reform Protests Continue
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
If you are discussing the fixed-term parliament act, along with the 55% dissolution proposal, it was drawn up by a Lib-Dem, and agreed by the coalition, so calling it Cameron's "Enablement Act", is at best, disingenuous, and at worst, smearing.

btw, from the BBC
So it was OK for Labour to propose and implement it in Scotland (at a higher threshold), but not for the ConLibDem's to do the same for the whole of the UK?

What's that funny smell - oh yes, it's the pungent reek of double-standards....
Where did I say that I supported anything other than a direct majority? I am not really interested in who proposed (although I suppose you have a link to who did), the fact that it is being proposed at all, should be ringing alarm bells for everyone.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote