View Single Post
Old 14-05-2010, 10:23   #13
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,900
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Retroactive legistlation

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf View Post
But no new crime is introduced here either. Obama is considering (retroactively) raising the amount the company is liable for. He's not introducing a new crime. It's still dodgy though.
Yeah. I was just pointing out that individuals have protection if this were to apply to standard criminal acts. Goverments in the EU, and presumably America (protect by their constitution), cannot introduce retrospective criminal acts.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote