Quote:
Originally Posted by tvtimes
<Snip>
Lol look at you getting all heating and abusive, i think i'll just ignore you and you ridiculous comments in the future.  Genius lol that's funny  |
I'm not the one getting heated and abusive dear boy. If you don't really get that this:
Quote:
|
There is more of a demand for vod than there is for HD.
|
Is a statement of fact there's not really a huge amount of discussion to be had, beyond my making the obvious point that using You Tube et al as a guide to the demand for VM's VoD is obviously quite disingenuous, and that until very recently there was a fee for HD on VM and even now V+ has a rental charge and you aren't getting HD on VM yet without one. Can't see that the HD only box has been released yet. I was actually discussing demand for VM's VoD. Given the thread was entitled 'Virgin Reports 200mln TV VoD Views' I would have thought discussion of You Tube, iPlayer, Sky Player and other Internet based services is somewhat irrelevant and 'VoD' would refer to VM's On Demand service.
Per my previous post we'll agree to disagree and life goes on
