Quote:
Originally Posted by mikegreen
Good luck with that...
I think I have just discovered the real reason for your zealous support of the Cons |
I see you've been reading the Labour play book for FUD.
That has no influence at all on me, somewhat more important things than broadband to make a voting decision on but please do feel free to keep making things up. I'm in London, I'll get nothing out of any government broadband intervention.
I don't remember making any comments about being a zealous support of the Conservatives though I also note that any criticism of Labour seems to have that as one of the default responses. As mentioned previously I think Cameron is a lightweight, I'm far from convinced by the Tories in many ways, however Labour have been a near total disaster through constant erosion of our rights and leaving us a huge bill to cover it.
So overall regarding your posts a fairly weak smear but given that Labour, and indeed its' supporters, have so little of their own positives to point to it would appear that's about the only course of action. Please carry on.
If you feel like some more reasoned debate my same question to Hiroki to you, why Labour?
EDIT: Incidentally that poster is hilarious, not least because the underlying implication is that Labour will look after those who refuse to work while the nasty Tories won't. A poster by welfare state addicts for welfare state addicts. Backfired a bit that one, not a message that appeals to those who pay for the people who refuse to work.