Originally Posted by Mr Angry

Gary, I would again draw your attention to the content of the article wherein it states that Mr Shah "refused to give an explanation for his actions".

As such, and without same, one cannot reasonably arrive at an opinion as to what the basis of his motivation was. Attempts to do so will only evidence a fundamental lack of understanding in relation to facts, reason, logic, consistencty and rationale.

It's the equivalent of trying to predict the future.

Oh, hold on there......

---------- Post added at 12:13 ---------- Previous post was at 12:06 ----------



Perfect example of flawed logic.

Someone unhappy about and offended by someone expressing anti british sentiments attempts to undermine the argument by suggesting that the individual concerned, rather than limiting their activities to vandalism, should swan off to a conflict and attempt to kill british soldiers in an attempt to validate their argument.

You see what you did there? You obviously haven't really though that one out.