Thread: Red Button v Sky HD
View Single Post
Old 25-04-2010, 18:27   #27
Charlie_Bubble
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Woking
Age: 55
Posts: 2,266
Charlie_Bubble has reached the bronze age
Charlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze ageCharlie_Bubble has reached the bronze age
Re: Red Button v Sky HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
I agree if the tv is large enough and is lcd its noticeable.

I more meant a lot of people still have crt or a screen thats not big enough to really notice the difference.

For sure on lcd's sdtv looks far worse than it does on a crt, on a crt sdtv is smoothed out as the pixels are not sharp.

---------- Post added at 15:52 ---------- Previous post was at 15:50 ----------



bit strong aint it?

I can watch a game of football and see what is happening fine? so why do I need to waste money on a new tv and hdtv subscription?
You might think so, but I think the statement, 'slightly higher quality' is utterly ridiculous. The difference between HD and SD is huge. Try watching HD for a couple of weeks on a decent sized TV (Something over 36 inches) and then change back to SD, it's like going from colour to black and white, especially in sport (And nature) programmes, and it's Sky Sports that you're talking about in this thread.
Charlie_Bubble is offline   Reply With Quote