View Single Post
Old 18-04-2010, 19:37   #265
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt D View Post
Any nuclear-armed rogue state would know that even if we did not have nuclear weapons any more, our allies would still have them, & would be assumed to come to our aid under our mutual/collective defence agreements.
Which would be the same mutual/collective defence agreements which didn't deter Argentina and didn't bring the US to our defence right?
Of course that'd never happen again would it?
Especially with the thought of our "allies" themselves becoming a target for nukes.
Xaccers is offline