Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy
According to one red top (sorry can't find a net link) she's now claiming £500,000 compo including £375,000 for "lost earnings" if she'd served a full 22 years.  |
Most women don't do the full 22 years, very far from it in fact
only six per cent of female soldiers serve their full 22 years.
---------- Post added at 14:41 ---------- Previous post was at 14:37 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C
Agreed. It is one thing missing a parade, but what if she'd been called on to go to war? Would she have missed that as well?
|
Probably, I wonder how her comrades feel about doing her guard duty etc so she can look after her baby, I think the army does its best to accomodate peoples needs and has been harshly dealt with here, just goes to show how biased employment tribunals are, you only have to turn up to win on even the most trivial of cases.