Quote:
Originally Posted by RizzyKing
If it is as it is reported then this whole thing could have been sorted quickly and easily with a quick conversation between the two parties which didn't happen because of whatever reason and completely inappropriate action was taken.
|
I am not disputing that. In fact, I have said as much three times now.
What I am disputing is that the person who reporting the incident is directly responsible. IF they are the manager concerned and just suspended the guy, then yes, they have to take some of the blame. The other part of the blame lays with the procedures within the company.
If they are not, then all they did was reported a concern to a superior. I don't see why they should be blamed for killing someone just for doing that.