View Single Post
Old 13-04-2010, 03:59   #34
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 61
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: Protesting. The boot is on the other foot.

This is an absolutely ridiculous ruling by the judge in question, its precisely rulings like these that sow discontent between different religions and groups in the UK.
How a judge can rule that it is permissible for one section of society to throw shoes at or in the direction of the object of their protest? when if a Christian, Hindu or Atheist were to do the same they'd get their collar felt.
We already have a number of irresponsible "newspapers" stirring up hatred toward Muslims, so how on earth are the main-stream supposed to debunk these so called journalists when we have judges making divisive laws such as this?
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote