View Single Post
Old 11-04-2010, 23:48   #91
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Politically Correct person makes man kill himself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed2020 View Post
I never said there was a law that says person B must be suspended. My original statement was about the relevance of third parties overhearing and being offended. There is plenty in law that says that this is relevant - it is not just about the nature of the conversation between person A and person B and how they both perceived it.
In response to my point about it being a managerial decision on how to handle it depending on what actually occured, you said it wasn't a managerial decision, it was a point of law.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed2020 View Post
Um... pardon? In the final part of your post (#61) you referred to "the two [people] involved". When having conversations and banter in the workplace you need to consider who else may overhear. As somebody overheard there were not two people involved - there were three.
We're talking about someone overhearing a conversation which two people are involved in, ie the person making the comment and the person it is directed at, understand?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote