View Single Post
Old 10-04-2010, 11:04   #220
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 1

This is an interesting story.

Quote:
The widespread unpopularity of the National Insurance increases, which it is feared will put the economic recovery at risk, has led to a rancorous inquest into who made the decision - which was taken against Treasury advice.

Allies of Chancellor Darling are desperate to avoid the blame, although the decision was announced in his pre-Budget report last November. Astonishingly, in an act of naked treachery, they are letting it be known that Gordon Brown himself was responsible.

Details are being circulated of a furious Cabinet confrontation in which Darling argued that it would be best to raise the extra funds through a rise in VAT, and leave National Insurance alone.

Although Peter Mandelson weighed in behind Darling, both men were overruled by Brown and his lackey, the Schools Secretary Ed Balls.
Ignoring the Mail's usual rhetoric this would make a fair amount of sense given past 'disagreements'.
Ignitionnet is offline