View Single Post
Old 08-04-2010, 15:26   #153
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,770
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers View Post
Social services which have been prominent in the public eye over recent years (for awful reasons), and neurological conditions like his late son had?
They have been there for awful reasons but those examples do not justify cutbacks, if anything they are an example of how important they are and the consequences of what happens if they are not there though either incompetence or cutbacks. Also they cannot be used as a barometer of the entire service.

---------- Post added at 15:26 ---------- Previous post was at 15:25 ----------

I don't use those services but would gladly pay 1% more NI as opposed to cutting back on them. I understand that this is not necessary the choice in front of us but if the choice was smaller government, less tax, but no one to provides services for the disabled, people with learning difficulties, and such or bigger government, more tax, but the services remain then I will go the latter.
Damien is online now