View Single Post
Old 02-04-2010, 01:12   #3
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 62
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: Sky talk a load of crap

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
The amount of reliance on Sky's TV money and the level of debt and reliance on sugar daddies amongst the clubs says otherwise. The Premier League themselves along with several other sports bodies also say otherwise.

Sky is not 'very expensive' given the investment in content, and regardless the issue isn't Sky's retail prices.
Agreed, its the over the top price they charge other company's to carry their premium services, by charging such a high amount this in itself allows Sky to maintain a monopoly.
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote