View Single Post
Old 21-03-2010, 00:45   #21
TheDon
Inactive
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,567
TheDon has reached the bronze age
TheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze ageTheDon has reached the bronze age
Re: Virgin Media in the local news!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick Fisher View Post
At one time I would have agreed with you.

However I once mistakenly opened a letter that was correctly adressed to my house but as I later found, to a person who I didn't know and to the best of my knowledge had never resided at said address.

From the contents of the letter and information obtained from subsequent phonecalls I learned that someone had used my address to obtain credit and a mobile phone contract. As I heard no more on the subject following my initial calls, it seems the matter was nipped in the bud.

In conclusion I think if a letter is addressed to your premises but to an person unknown you should open it a.) for your own protection
and/or b.) to discover the sender so you can inform them their information is in error and so prevent further communications on the subject being made.
Or just put "return to sender, not at this address" on the envelope and stick it back in the postbox so you don't commit a crime.
TheDon is offline   Reply With Quote