Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldova
That is itself makes me wonder how a so called Telecommunications professional can actually still be in business if you are willing to post private numbers online.
|
Not just that, but as the numbers he's disputing are his own I'm pretty sure that he's well aware that he's called them. So by calling VM to dispute these numbers he's actually attempting to commit fraud. He knows he's called them, and yet he's still calling VM going "I might not have called them!" and trying to claim that because some equipment has been compromised it means he shouldn't have to pay for calls he KNOWS he's made.
I'd love to see this in court, because the only arguments he can make both involve incriminating himself in a crime. Either equipment has been compromised by him and he's artificially inflating traffic (including on his own account) hence VM are with holding revenue and he hasn't actually made those calls on his bill directly, in which case he's commiting mass fraud. Or, it hasn't been compromised, he HAS made the calls himself despite trying to tell VM he hasn't, so he's committing fraud by trying to get a refund on his bills by claiming he hasn't made them (even though in this case VM would also be, it doesn't mean it's ok for him to commit a crime in trying to bring it to light).