View Single Post
Old 18-02-2010, 19:38   #57
skyisdabest
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5
skyisdabest doesn't have many friendsskyisdabest doesn't have many friendsskyisdabest doesn't have many friends
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahardie View Post
Fifteen? I must admit I had you down as being a bit younger. Perhaps because I've got a 13 year old grandson who is a lot more mature than you.
why

---------- Post added at 19:37 ---------- Previous post was at 19:36 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvtimes View Post
Some people won't be happy till they see Vm gone, they'll soon change their views when an un-challenged sky put the prices up.

---------- Post added at 17:41 ---------- Previous post was at 17:39 ----------



Vm can not afford tp put the subs up. They do every year inline with sky and inflation. In fairness to Virgin at least when the subs go up we are seeing additions to our services.
they cant put money up bcos people will just go to sky and virgin wont have any people left which means no money

---------- Post added at 19:38 ---------- Previous post was at 19:37 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul M View Post
Please stick to the topic, and remember that baiting any member is likely to get you warnings.
thankyou av a beer from me
skyisdabest is offline   Reply With Quote