Some people won't be happy till they see Vm gone, they'll soon change their views when an un-challenged sky put the prices up.
---------- Post added at 17:41 ---------- Previous post was at 17:39 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiles2
If VM do sell of their channels to Sky so that they can concentrate on their broadband, and mobile services, as well as TV On Demand, does that mean that our subs will increase even more?
Over the years, buying and selling by companies NEVER, NEVER EVER benefits the customer, only the shareholders and managers. And with incomes continuing to shrink (apart from the managers and the shareholders of course) it might mean that more and more people are going to find it much harder to meet their ever increasing bills.
In any case, I thought that with Sky buying these channels from VM is supposed to be anti-competitive.
|
Vm can not afford tp put the subs up. They do every year inline with sky and inflation. In fairness to Virgin at least when the subs go up we are seeing additions to our services.