View Single Post
Old 07-02-2010, 11:51   #14
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Mac address daily limit

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingDaveRa View Post
Oh now I see.

Well I'd imagine those line cards are pretty pricey. I know most Cisco blades for their big switches are usually five figures, so they probably saved a lot of money. Plus all the extra chassis and infrastructure they wouldn't have had to buy. From a purely commercial standpoint, I can see why they did it.
Me too, shame as I alluded to back in 2008 it's caused issues with upstream congestion now. Someone forgot the stop off in between DOCSIS 1 and DOCSIS 3, the upstream increasing DOCSIS 2, and just bunged DOCSIS 3 kit either end of a load of networks that were only really DOCSIS 1 ready.

Fine until too many modems got onto the DOCSIS 3 platform and killed the single DOCSIS 1.1 upstream channel available to each node, then BT were rude enough to start rolling out 10Mbps upstreams which necessitates DOCSIS 2 upstream to compete with so thanks to that commercial decision it's now catch up time both in terms of present capacity requirements and future ones.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote