Quote:
Originally Posted by Morden
What goes around comes around. on one hand SKY were happy to expand their broadband based on piggy backing on BT's national network after OFCOM had previously ruled that BT must open up its network which spent billions and years of work on. If BT had not invested in their network upgrading exchanges, lines, etc, over a number of the last few decades then the only broadband would be Virgins. BT had to allow others access just like SKY will have to now. That access obviously dented BT's monopoly on telecoms just like this will dent SKY's monopoly on sports.
|
Very well put i agree entirely.
Also a fact i had not realised is sky sports collection is more expensive at the moment then sky subs pay!
Just been on skys website and it states if you work the pricing out sky sports collection is £18 extra with any mix of channels from 1-6.
On cable i currently pay £20.50 but the price on cable is anywhere between £20.50-£26 for sky sports collection depending on tv package.
And no red button interactive on cable,which sky now regularly put content on,therefore at the moment we get an inferior service at a higher price,how can this be justified i would like to know.