View Single Post
Old 18-01-2010, 12:04   #78
Arthurgray50@blu
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: OFCOM ready to rule?

Sky won't be forced to do anything, they will go to the courts over this, they will feel that they are entitled to charge what they want.

In the end it comes down to one thing - the customer. I think in all seriousness, that the customer demands the best of everything for what they pay, if VM for example wanted to offer the Sky sports package at say a fiver a month, then surely they will lose money, if they pay Sky prices, and when it come to clubs losing money, l can't see how, the only thing l would like to see, where Sky are forced to cover games below the championship, where money is needed.

Ie when the last time you watched game from the Blue Square or watched Crewe play, its these games and players that provide the 'meat' for the big clubs.
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote