View Single Post
Old 17-01-2010, 12:22   #47
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: Smacking ban in schools loophole

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogermevans View Post
hmm so now people want to stop parents being able to give those they leave their kids with the right to punish their child in the ay they believe is right and lawful ?


Who's they? the parents or the teachers?


Quote:
not in favour of abuse myself but smacking isn't automatically abuse in law or in real life
In the article there are instances of abuse. smacking was further up. you have to do what martyh did, and read the whole article

---------- Post added at 13:22 ---------- Previous post was at 13:19 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
i think Kymmy is trying to say that you have dug a reeeeeely big hole for yourself Gary , bet you want to go back to bed and start again later now
I'll explain. if I just said what Kymmy had said and nothing else. I would be accused of being biased/prejudiced for not mentioning anything else in the whole article. because I pointed out the thing about the Muslims and nothing else.

It was like 'actually it is about the Muslims. reading the article through the quoted muslim incidents isn't smacking, but instead blatant physical assualt'

Who's going to watch the dinner if I go back to bed?
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote