View Single Post
Old 17-01-2010, 10:09   #17
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
re: Smacking ban in schools loophole

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
No, the fact that it also applies to Christian Sunday Schools, probably Jewish part-time education facilities, and the chances that you and the Daily Mail have focused on the Muslim aspect.
You're not reading the thread properly

---------- Post added at 11:08 ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
but the loophole isn't just for muslims is it ,so it isn't "1 law for us ,but not for others " it's the same law for everyone
I know that. why do you think I put others and not Muslims?
I think the Daily Mail have used the Muslim word as they are the majority that this affects the most.

---------- Post added at 11:09 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
Yes - they can remove them from the educational establishment (and from their relatives homes, as it is the same "loophole" that covers both areas).
But the member of staff or parent cannot be held accountable for their actions? they are effectively covered by law?
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote