Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
a) A planned march in Harrow was effectively banned by the authorities advising that it shouldn't go ahead. There was violence where Muslims attacked the Police.
b) There was violence at a London protest about the Danish cartoons which were about the prophet Mohammed.
|
a) What -
this march, or
this one? They both appear to have gone ahead, even if the second one was farcical, with idiotic anti-fascist protestors needlessly escalating the incidents into violent confrontations.
b)
no there wasn't - there was incitement to violence by the idiots protesting, but could you please provide a link to the violence that took place, as I can't find it (but more than willing to accept it did, if you can provide a link). btw, 4 of the protesters were
jailed for that.
I do love your phrase "effectively banned" - it is "effectively meaningless" (imho) (or does it mean they didn't get what they wanted, so they are going to go cry to their mummies?)
So, in summary - the marches in Harrow you said were banned, weren't; the violence you said took place at the anti-Danish cartoon protests in London, didn't.
You appear to have a proclivity to sub-optimal interpretation of available information (translated - you make stuff up to support your viewpoint
).
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupid stunt
Send them all back and while they're at it send gordon brown back to scotland.
|
Does the same rule apply to all the Scots, Welsh, Irish, Sith Afreekans, Kiwis, Aussies, Septics, Canucks, etc?