View Single Post
Old 03-01-2010, 17:44   #36
superbiatch
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Age: 48
Services: Sky+, Sky Broadband and Talk
Posts: 3,819
superbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny star
superbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to superbiatch
Re: Charging drunks that abuse the NHS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu View Post
Supermarket and shops are responsible, plus you could go as far as the Pubs, for allowing drinkers to go over the top.
When i worked in the off licence, I signed a contract to say I wouldn't sell to underage drinkers, police officers in uniform (weird I know) and those who are already intoxicated.

On more than one occasion I almost got attacked for deciding a customer was already too drunk, only for burly customers stepping in to save me I was lucky, but its not all down to those who have to decide to not serve them, surely the drinker has to take some responsibility?? Its ok saying we could call the police, but we were always graded and told an officer would be with us within an hour - they are busy people, so i'm not moaning about it.

Its about time 'we' took responsibility for what we drink and stop blaming everyone else.
superbiatch is offline   Reply With Quote