View Single Post
Old 03-01-2010, 17:09   #35
Arthurgray50@blu
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: Charging drunks that abuse the NHS

I think a responsibility must go down to supermarkets and shops selling the booze cheap, l can buy a can of lager for 35p. in Tesco.

If the people that *need* drink to survive, and they go to the shops, and the shops know that they are *drunk* then the shop should be prosecuted, and the money given to the NHS, l have seen so many people drunk out of there skulls at 7.30am in a certain part of West London, this is what the major problem is - shops sell to make money, but if that store KNOWS who they are and that they are drunk, and sell to that drunk, then that is it.

Supermarket and shops are responsible, plus you could go as far as the Pubs, for allowing drinkers to go over the top.
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote