View Single Post
Old 03-01-2010, 13:20   #30
superbiatch
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Age: 48
Services: Sky+, Sky Broadband and Talk
Posts: 3,819
superbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny star
superbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to superbiatch
Re: Charging drunks that abuse the NHS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nidge View Post
Simple solution make it like Norway where it's £5+ a pint. There's no alcohol fuelled violence over there.
Isn't 'that' just the point though Nidge, not many countries on the continent have problems like we do - they don't binge drink and I don't understand why we do

Still, I don't think you can charge someone for being drunk over drug users, smokers, obese people - these are lifestyle choices people make and all cost the NHS £millions. Most trusts have a 'zero tolerence' policy where they can turn away anyone being abusive towards them. Of course if the person is in a serious state, then chances are they aren't going to be causing too much havoc.
superbiatch is offline   Reply With Quote