Quote:
Originally Posted by webcrawler2050
Without throwing a spanner in the works, which should they? Why should they offer an form of evalution. The "british" system falls for this trick far too much and I am sick of it.
|
Because executing people who may be mentally ill is on as par with eugenics and humanely reprehensible, that's why.
Nobody in recent British history has been on trial for their life and required an evaluation in order to live - Britain (rather the judicial system as opposed to the general populus as evidenced by some in this thread) has long abandoned support for such barbaric and inhumane practices.
Bi-polar is a recognised illness - there is no need to put the word ill in quotations.
---------- Post added at 11:40 ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMG
I suspect it was a ploy, which the Chinese saw through.
|
Then you obviously haven't read any of the substantive documentary evidence (predating his arrest I might add) which is available from the reprieve site.