Originally Posted by Moldova

So Hayley was drunk and she made the error of crossing the road to talk to friends and was halfway across when a speeding car hit her killing her instantaneously.

being drunk is not a reason to be killed but it can be a contributary factor in SOME cases ,however in this case i'm not sure it makes any difference

Also that report states that the was no reason for his blues and two's to be off as the was no pursuit to be alerted and he was just pursuing a vehicle for reasons unknown and said vehicle was doing less than 30MPH..


that's the main discrepancy i found between the drivers training and the ipcc's own code of conduct ,they do tend to conflict with each other and can be interpreted differently which imo is wrong.There should be no room for mis-interpretation of training or rules when lives are at stake

The was actually a group of friends and a 2nd speeding Police car so the could potentially have been a massacre if everyone had decided to cross the road.

agreed ,especially if they decided to do what they sometimes do and play chicken or throw bricks at the cars

Quite an interesting read and the question of drink is only at the start and the rest is focused on the officer not doing his job correctly, nice find.

it does show what happened without the tabloid hype

Just a thought as it says restricted all over that document are you allowed to post it in a public forum for everyone to see considering the amount of detail in the PDF.