Thread: This one's going down
View Single Post
Old 26-12-2009, 21:56   #450
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: This one's going down
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
your logic ,you refuse to accept that a balance must be achieved between catching criminals and public safety .now i agree that public safety is the most important ,i don't deny that ,but sometimes a officer has to make a descision wether or not to chase a criminal he weighs up the risk to the public and makes that descision . in this case the officer felt that because the road and the path were deserted it was acceptible to chase the supposed criminal at speed for the short period it would take to catch him up ,under your logic that chase would never happen because the risk is too great
So...you got all of that from, me asking that police officers follow their training and guidelines to saying that I suggest that the police don't chase criminals? Wow, that really is some jump in logic, isn't it?

The road and path was not deserted though, was it? They were occupied by a sixteen year old child.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote