View Single Post
Old 23-12-2009, 22:06   #411
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: This one's going down

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
in the same situation Flyboy what would you have done ?
I would have:

Quote:
slow down a bit? It would not have taken much off the pursuit time, to have slowed down to forty miles per hour, allowing enough stopping time in the event of an emergency.


---------- Post added at 23:04 ---------- Previous post was at 23:02 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
For many years, it has been the requirement of all police drivers to carry out dynamic risk assessments when conducting a pursuit. As I said earlier, the driver of the subject vehicle was not evading capture, so therefore it appears there was little need for that speed.
i suggest you watch the video again and try to understand what was happening
I have and still don't get the point you are making, perhaps you could explain.

---------- Post added at 23:06 ---------- Previous post was at 23:04 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
the whys and wherefors of what he did wrong have been done to death you have your opinion i have mine ,we will never agree so i don't see the point of rehashing old news

and there wasn't a high speed pursuit ,he accelerated to catch up with the car that is not by any stretch of your imagination a high speed pursuit
Definition of pursuit and high speed, please explain.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote