View Single Post
Old 21-12-2009, 18:08   #363
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: This one's going down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldova View Post
He should serve his full term behind bars as Hayley's mum cannot see her child at Christmas then why should he, jail should be a punishment not an inconvenience.

I have ZERO pity for this man or his family as he brought this on himself and took a life.
I shouldn't think that it is for his benefit, but the children's. But then, I would say that they could probably do without him as a father.

---------- Post added at 19:08 ---------- Previous post was at 19:02 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by LondonRoad View Post
So should we open the gates and let everybody who has chldren out of prison for Christmas.

Hang on, that isn't fair on the poor prisoners who don't have kids.
Many prisoners are released, on home visits, over Christmas. There are several reasons for this. For example:
  • So that the criminal's family doesn't have to suffer
  • So that the prison population is reduced and therefore allows more prison officers to have time off and spend it with their families.

This release is not restricted to parents either, it happens to non-parents as well. Also, it is a privilege earned and can be (and often is) withdrawn at a moment's notice.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote