Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Well perhaps one judge, they found 800 max who may have voted of 13 000, 92% of the 11 000 which did vote, voted to strike, still a substantial majority even taking those into account, elections have been won and lost with less voting irregularities than that but I bet our learned friend wouldn't have a bar of that in court.
|
Because it's not relevant. Either the strike ballot has been legally performed or it has not. It is not in the judge's gift to determine what may or may not have been the outcome had the irregularities been discounted.
If it has been illegally performed, then it must be set aside. Anything else is a red herring.