View Single Post
Old 18-12-2009, 21:08   #25
Sparkle
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Open Prison, H.M.United Kingdom
Posts: 1,037
Sparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful oneSparkle is the helpful one
Re: £6 billion to buy climate change deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf View Post
Personally, I think solar energy is the way to go. The sun is an (almost) endless supply of energy, that is more than sufficient to cater to the energy needs of the planet.
I certainly agree with you there. All energy we use with the exception of nuclear (which includes geothermal), originated from the sun. Just think of all the tens of thousands of square miles of desert around the world that could be harnessed to provide all the energy we ever needed.
The problem isn't technology, its whether the generated energy would be cheaper than that supplied from oil or nuclear sources.
In a nut shell, cheap oil is preventing most other sources of energy which we could be using, from gaining a foothold in our energy economy.
There has never been an energy crisis, just an oil crisis.
Sparkle is offline   Reply With Quote