Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobes
Exactly, it's what me and others, including frog, have been saying all along. We're not VM bashers we just want to be kept far more informed by this company...
After all, VM/cable has the capability of blowing Sky's out of the water when it comes to what it COULD achieve...but unless they are willing to let us know what the F is going on who where and why it all becomes a bit of a fiasco.
|
Ok lets play it by your game, if virign had cam eout and said they wher enegetion with espn to get hd and ther eotehr channels and make htem part of the xl pack before sky had signed them up properly do you not thik sky owuld have not have tried to get deal so it was with sky sports? it all coems down to comerical sense which is keep quit tehn surpirse everyone or oyu could do what sky does and annouce it then allow other to get oen ver you
But i agree with wha toyur sayign cusotmer should be told more than they are but you are looking to know what there doign befor econtracts are signed which isnt good business sense
Maybe what virign should do is makea page on there site that lsit channesl coming soon and what epg numebr ie once there confimred with contrats and onyl test shave to be done then ther eon that page with a launch date and epg number and the same goes for channels confirmed to be leaving so we know when there leaving