Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
The asking of the question suggests grounds of which to suspect they might be. Unless you come from the Glenn Beck school of debate, in which you think by framing a insult as a question you are not actually accusing anyone.
Are you a member of the national front by any chance?
---------- Post added at 20:18 ---------- Previous post was at 20:17 ----------
You asked where anyone, including her, claimed that was said. You have been provided evidence that the claimant did indeed claim they called her a terrorists.
|
Quote:
|
The two-day trial ended when Judge Clancy ruled that the evidence against the hoteliers was "inconsistent" and dismissed the case.
|
Quote:
|
Explaining his reasons for dismissal, Judge Clancy said Mrs Tazi's claim that she was verbally attacked for up to an hour had not been backed up by the other witnesses.
|
Quote:
|
Judge Clancy said: "I'm not satisfied on the facts that this case has been made out."
|
Evidence?
That's just it, he didn't ask the question(implied or otherwise),
she did
.
Quote:
|
Mr Vogelenzang said: 'She took the examples of history and she started provoking me by saying 'Oh, will you tell me then that I'm a murderer, that I'm a Nazi? You're telling me I'm a terrorist?'
|
'will you tell me' states that he didn't ask the question or make a statement of that sort directed at her.