View Single Post
Old 08-12-2009, 10:59   #37
Welshchris
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wales UK
Age: 43
Services: 50mb Cable, L TV and Phone XL.
Posts: 3,480
Welshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful oneWelshchris is the helpful one
Re: Drink drivers face car crushing

What about Motocyclists? I know a family who had their 7 year old daughter killed by a drunk motocyclist. These should also be covered.

---------- Post added at 10:59 ---------- Previous post was at 10:57 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldova View Post
I think that if you caught by the Police under the influence of Drink or Drugs then your car should be crushed as you have absolutely no excuse as to why this should not happen.

I also believe that you cannot use the excuse that another member of the family relies on that car for other reasons as that is the responsibility of the driver and if you allowed this card to be played then most people would use it, and what then is the to stop the person who was drunk from getting back into that car.

I also think that the same should apply to mobile phone use as the present system does nothing to stop people using them while driving, but if your car was to be crushed you may think again.
I disagree with the part about if another member of the family uses it.
What if its a motobility car and the person that was driving wasnt their car and had taken it without the owners consent?
Welshchris is offline   Reply With Quote