View Single Post
Old 26-11-2004, 16:58   #7
Bifta
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Bifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny starBifta has a nice shiny star
Re: The death of Athlon XP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeph
Can anyone explain to me what the difference is between the Athlon and Sempron are, different di size? Better/worse performance, I thought they were the budget versions like the Durons used to be, what's going on then? :worried:
The Sempron is the new Duron, duRON ... sempRON, It's AMD's budget range of processors.

For general CPU usage (i.e. not just gaming) a Sempron 2800 is slightly faster than the Athlon XP 2500, whereas the Athlon XP 2800 outclasses it easily (mind you, so does the Celeron 335 in a lot of gaming tests). It's sit's performance wise somewhere between the Duron and the Athlon XP.
Bifta is offline   Reply With Quote