Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
"too prejudiced" 
Or perhaps lacking the ability to mind-read, as there was no indication that the two quotes were not linked, and no link to the source - could you please explain how readers of the post were supposed to know the two lines weren't linked.
Addendum - just read flyboy's post of 16:43 and they were linked; I wonder whose prejudices are showing now?  |
So you think that most readers of that post would have thought that the two issues were closely connected? Surely the point of Flyboy's comment is that he(/she?) recognised that they were not connected in that manner and that is what they were complaining about, rather than contributing to the topic under discussion.
Flyboy's post post @ 16:43 simply says that the OP's website says the same thing. That doesn't preclude the possibility that the text on the website could be the result of cut and paste of two quotes without reading how the 2nd quote started. The fact that the text is in two separate paragraphs, in itself shows a change of subject.