Quote:
Originally Posted by adzii_nufc
The Argument will go nowhere because 50% of people are willing to believe what is put in front of them and the other 50% couldnt care less about this elaborate scheme
|
I kind of hope that more than 50% will believe the scientific argument over the conspirational, ill-informed argument that you have put forward. You claim it's a trick but you have yet to produce evidence while the scientists, who know a lot more about science, have produced evidence. I.E The acculturated rate of warming over previous warming cycles as well as a explanation into how this is being caused. You have said "it's all a con". Who do you think a observer is going to believe?
Quote:
|
Everyone has opinions and if This Global Warming was such a 'Serious threat' there would be a lot more going on than there is at the minute Because Honestly It seems most countires are not buying this crap either..
|
Because Global Warming is an expensive thing for a country to deal with. Some industries will be hit hard because they can produce a lot more at a cheaper rate if they use populating methods. If people use more fuel efficient cars, they pay less tax as well as needing less fuel. Meaning less tax.
Quote:
|
Yes but how do you know Its been the last 100 years. We have no idea if they have predicted anything correctly?
|
Predicted = future.
Last 100 years = Past.
You don't need to 'predict' what has happened in the last 100 years.