View Single Post
Old 10-11-2009, 15:11   #23
Pierre
cf.mega poster
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,334
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: 10 new nuclear power station sites named

Quote:
Originally Posted by RizzyKing View Post
Coal is not the answer to the problem we face now and we have to start looking at practical solutions and put less emphasis on green and more on lower pollution technology that actually delivers sustainable efficient power.
Nor is just nuclear.

A sensible government would have several methods of generation. we should have a mix, as we do now.

Coal Fired
Gas Fired
Hydro
Wind
Tidal
Nuclear

We should keep a diverse portfolio of generation methods. The nuclear plants are nearing end of life and they should be replaced with newer ones - that's all.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Pierre is offline   Reply With Quote