View Single Post
Old 10-11-2009, 11:48   #46
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 45
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: Gordon Brown attacked over letter 'insult'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
It's not like he called him smith or clarke, Janes/James.

In future why not just not send any letters out at all?
Do you send out letters without checking them?

If you were sending a condolence to a grieving woman that you were partially responsible for, would you have checked it? Still sent it out misnamed, misspelt and with scribbled-out words?

I can understand his writing is poor, he makes mistakes as we all do. However it shows a stunning lack of nonchalence that he couldn't bother to check something so serious. Its not like he hasn't had the support to do it. The guy has speech writers on his permanant staff.
punky is offline   Reply With Quote