[Stuart]

Actually, looking at that article, the standard of journalism is appalling (although sadly par for the course for the Mail).

The headline, at best, misses half the story and at worst is false. The reporter appears to have gone in with a definate bias, and seems determined to make it look like another case of big brother interfering with our rights, and they even refer back to a story about a woman smacking her child in a supermarket (which actually isn't either relevant or fair to the woman who has been reported to the social services).

Finally, they don't even have the balls to publish the name of the hack that wrote it.