View Single Post
Old 10-11-2009, 10:21   #33
Saaf_laandon_mo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,291
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Re: Gordon Brown attacked over letter 'insult'

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
I think as the PM he should have known the name before hand and not reading his name out for the first time. Even if he had to, then surely the could have been printed clearly enough for him to read.

Rizzy's post comes to mind. We are keep being told that Brown's eyesight doesn't affect his job but when it apparently does then they say we all must excuse him for it.

And now we're told he is too busy to re-write a letter because he scribbled out a mistake on it? Noone is that busy. Besides 5 mins spent back then could have saved a hell of a lot of time now.

Also, Mrs Janes received letters from a lot of busy people like the Queen and DOD but only Brown's letter was inexcusable.

If Brown can't even write a letter, what exactly qualifies him for running a country?
That old saying, "if you want a job done properly, do it yourself" obviously doesn't apply to Mr Brown.
Saaf_laandon_mo is offline   Reply With Quote