View Single Post
Old 10-11-2009, 08:23   #21
Saaf_laandon_mo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,291
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Re: Gordon Brown attacked over letter 'insult'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
.
.
.


His name was Jamie Janes. It's not unthinkable he thought it was James. Could easily have heard wrong, saw it written wrong, and so on. The fact is that Brown obviously writes to every soldiers family and if the story was he sent out letters written by someone else then there would also be outrage.

.
.
..
It don't think there are any excuses for getting the name of a dead soldier wrong if you are writing his family a personal letter. He would have had full details of the dead soldier's name, and to get that wrong, in my opinion, is extremely poor and I'd add distasteful. When I write a letter to someone I don't know personally I make sure I double check the details to make sure they are correct. For Gordon Brown not to do so in this case might be forgiveable, but its extremely poor.
Saaf_laandon_mo is offline   Reply With Quote