View Single Post
Old 09-11-2009, 22:06   #11
Osem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Re: 10 new nuclear power station sites named

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldova View Post
The is millions of tonnes of coal left in all the old mining areas where the mines where closed and deliberately sealed with rubble and concrete to make them not cost effective to reopen and all the surface buildings demolished in most cases.

This has led to us importing the vast majority of the coal we use when we could still be self sufficient.
Would reopening these mines cost more than the £££billions involved in planning, building, running, maintaining, decommissioning and dealing with the waste of these power stations for hundreds/thousands of years I wonder?
Osem is offline   Reply With Quote