Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
Saaf, whatever the rules the school have are, in my opinion, it is idiotic to not have the tie as an option.
You like others have a different take on the matter, that is fine.
|
The rule might be idiotic to the child's parents but its still a rule that the school has. So rather than taking the child out of school because of teh rule, I would say that it would be more beneficial for the child in the long run to put up with the rule in favour of a school education.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
But as I have said before, although it may not cost the LEA directly in terms of paying for books etc for the child to be educated at home, what is the true cost, in terms of a child who has not had the usual mainstream educating?
Probably someone unable to mix with people, because they have been taught in a confined area.
|
The parents should think about this before they took their steps to remove her from school. They are the ones inflicting any disadvantages on their child, not the school.
---------- Post added at 12:28 ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
.
.
.
.
It is about dressing appropriately, and if the child does not learn this lesson at school, what chance does she have in the real world? It may not be fair, but it's real.
|
I feel it's also about respecting rules of an establishment. If the parents are saying its ok for her not to follow the rules by taking her out of school, what sort of lesson does that give her for the future too.